Register free!

SC Cases - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last Documents Found: 4365    Title Forum  Year Sharp Industries Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 281771] SC 2005 Harshad Chiman Lal Modi vs DLF Universal and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 281770] SC 2005 State of U.P. vs Amaramani Tripathi, Madhumani Tripathi [LexDoc Id : 281767] SC 2005 Devinder Singh and Ors. vs State of Punjab [LexDoc Id : 281766] SC 2005 H.P.S.E.B. and Anr. vs Richard and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 306779] HC (Himachal Pradesh) 2005 Parasrampuria Trading and Finance Ltd., In re Liability of directors-Fraudulent conduct of business-An application against the ex-directors of the company for fraudulent conduct of business under s.542 and s.543 of the Companies Act 1956 was maintain [LexDoc Id : 297356] HC (Allahabad) 2005 Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs ITO Penalty: Failure to deduct tax at source-Exempt gratuity payments-AY 1997-98, 1998-99. The assessee, a government company, had paid gratuity to its employees under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972. This amount was no [LexDoc Id : 293657] ITAT (Nagpur) 2005 Biren V. Savla vs ACIT Undisclosed investments: Unexplained cash credits-Presumption under s.132(4A), Books of accounts-AY 1993-94 – 1995-96. No addition as unexplained investment could be made to the assessee’s income, as the transactions shown in the seized diaries ha [LexDoc Id : 292915] ITAT (Mumbai) 2005 ACIT vs Sonal Share and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. Speculation of business -Deduction of expenses-AY 1996-97. The assessee earned its income from brokerage as well as in speculation business of shares. The loss incurred by it in the business of sal [LexDoc Id : 291485] ITAT (Mumbai) 2005 Arajkiya Khwaja Shahid Hussain Primary Teacher Training College vs State of Bihar and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 288920] Patna HC 2005 ACIT vs Malli Chand Baid Validity of reassessment-Failure to issue notice u/s 143(2)-AY 1998-99. The reassessment proceedings were invalid, as they had been initiated to surmount the time-barred notice that had been issued under s.143( [LexDoc Id : 288561] ITAT (Nagpur) 2005 Jai Kumar Jain vs ACIT Computation of Undisclosed Income-Telescoping-For computing the undisclosed income, the benefit of telescoping and set off of investment and expenditure was to be allowed on the expenditure and in [LexDoc Id : 288353] ITAT Jaipur 2005 Ashok Behari Lal (HUF) vs ACIT Computation of capital gains-Sale of shares with negative covenants-AY 1994-95. The amount received by the assessee, a minority group of shareholders of a company, on sale of its shares to the majority group, could not [LexDoc Id : 287732] ITAT Delhi 2005 CIT vs Vijaya Bank Validity of reassessment-Information, change of opinion-AY 1992-93 to 1995-96. The notice for reopening of the assessment was invalid, as it gave no "information" but was based solely on a change of opinio [LexDoc Id : 285604] HC (Karnataka) 2005 Obettee (P) Ltd. vs Mohd. Shafiq Khan [LexDoc Id : 283712] SC 2005 B.V. Star vs CC [LexDoc Id : 283563] SC 2005 Joseph Severance and Ors. vs Benny Mathew and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 283527] SC 2005 Aniglase Yohannan vs Ramlatha and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 283070] SC 2005 Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 281768] SC 2005 Radhe Associates and Anr. vs Official Liquidator of Piramal Financial Service Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 308866] HC (Gujarat) 2005 Sakila vs Banarasi Das and anr. [LexDoc Id : 305122] HC (Uttaranchal) 2005 CIT vs M.M.T.C. Maintainability of Appeal-Appeal by PSU-The appeal filed by the assessee, a public sector undertaking, was not maintainable since prior approval from the High Powered Committee was not obtai [LexDoc Id : 297574] HC (Delhi) 2005 H. P. S. Chawla vs Dr. N. P. S. Chawla and Ors [LexDoc Id : 295677] HC (Delhi) 2005 CIT vs International Airport Authority India Ltd. Maintainability of appeal to High Court-Appeal against PSU-The appeal filed by the Department to the high court against a public sector undertaking without getting a clearance from the High Powered Committee w [LexDoc Id : 294204] HC (Delhi) 2005 CIT vs Daljeet Tyres Manufacture-Printing tin plates-AY 1989-90. The assessee was engaged in the business of printing tin plates. It was entitled to investment allowance since the printing was a “manufac [LexDoc Id : 291597] HC (Allahabad) 2005   First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last